- The traditional means of achieving this is with the passive grease trap (interceptor). The first patent was lodged by Nathaniel Whiting of California in the late 1800’s. The design remains pretty much unchanged. The current industry standard for passive grease interceptors is ASME A112.14.3, (or PDI-GD101).
- A grease recovery device (GRD) is a recent development which aims to separate out the grease and water and collect the grease for recycling. The current industry standard for GRD’s is ASME A112.14.4.
- Both traditional traps and GRD’s use the same physics which is that grease and oil are lighter than water and will rise to the top when the mix is allowed to stand for a time. They both feature a tank with an inverted wire at the outlet in order to allow water out but not grease. A traditional trap is designed to hold the grease within its tank constantly reducing its working volume and hence its ability to allow the required dwell time of 27 seconds or more for the grease/water separation to occur.
- The design codes for traps allow for an average efficiency of as little as 85% between cleanouts for the trap to be considered adequate. This means that on average 15% of the grease in the waste water is entering the sewer line. Eventually even with a robust cleanout regime it is likely that there will be a sewer backup.
- A problem with a traditional trap is that it must be emptied out either by scooping out or pumping all the contents and carting the effluent away to a specialist renderer or to landfill. This is a very unpleasant undertaking and is in consequence often neglected causing the same problems as if the trap were not there at all.
- To try to maintain some degree of efficiency there has been a trend to specify larger and larger traps. Unfortunately providing a large tank for the effluent to stand also means that food waste scraps also have the time to settle out at the bottom of the tank further reducing the available volume and adding to the clean out problem.